|
|
||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
|
DISCIPLINES:
Navigation |
Preventing spins with rigid wing hang gliders
About the author: Translated: WildArt! Creations 2002 Not just a beginners problem
Several experienced pilots have reported entering spins completely unexpectedly under "normal flying conditions". The physical explanation for this is usually that the pilots in question do not recognise the point when air-flow across the wing breaks off partially and the wing goes into a stall, until it is too late. However, there are some constructional trimming steps which can be taken to reduce the danger of spinning. Goals To emphasize: neither it is wished to stir up fears of spinning a rigid wing hang glider, nor should real existing problems be ignored or relativized. The spin
1. Entering a spin
However, as a reduction in airspeed is achieved through changing the gliders angle of attack, spinning rigid wing hang gliders is often associated with slow flying in practice. 2. Spinning
This makes spinning with rigid wing hang gliders particularly dangerous !
Smaller versions of rigid wing hang gliders are generally easier to put into a spin (i.e. show an increased spin susceptibility), but when spinning tend to behave more predictably ! 3. Recovering
Recovering from a spin is generally associated with a loss of 50 - 80 meters in height. In case of doubt throw your reserve immediately if you enter a spin close to the ground ! Factors which influence the susceptibility to spinning Three of the main factors which influence the susceptibility of rigid wing hang gliders to enter spinning are: 1. wing twist ; 2. control bar position ; 3. centre of gravity (trimming). Other factors such as the distribution of lift across the wing, the wing profile distribution, the wing twist distribution and the wing taper are not considered here, but certainly influence the spinning characteristics of a rigid wing in a very complex manner. 1. Wing twist
The negative influence of increased twist at the wing tips (especially when flying at highspeed final glides) is usually the reason that competition pilots try to tune their gliders to actively reduce the twist. But too less twist can dangerously influence the stall characteristics of the glider.
2. Control bar position
3. Centre of gravity and trimming effects Should a rigid wing hang glider be trimmed too far back, entering a thermal and inducing a turn at the same time can then lead to a loss of control, unexpectedly stalling one side of the wing and resulting in a spin. That aside, a slowly trimmed rigid wing hang glider requires much less pressure on the bar to stall it than a faster trimmed one which also increases the risk of unexpected stalling and spinning.
Should a lightweight pilot borrow a heavier pilots glider then it is important to re-adjust the centre of gravity by bringing the hang loop point further forward! Read the guidelines in the gliders manual ! Spoilers and their effects When a spoiler works it doesn’t only create the required roll and yaw forces, but also induces an unwanted pitch moment nosing up.
The main danger from the induced spoiler pitch is when thermalling slowly (just above the stall point of the wing), and then trying to core the thermal better by activating the spoiler. This can then abruptly stall the inner wing and cause a spin ! Flaps Pulling on positive flap (i.e. angling them down) increases the lift of the wing at constant airspeed. Through this the trim-speed and minimum speed of the wing are consequently reduced. This effect is measurable on all current rigid wing hang gliders (see the test reports in "Fly and Glide": Exxtacy (5/1998 p. 38), Atos (7/1999 p. 33), ESC (8/2000 p. 48), Atos S (11/2000 p. 37 ff.), Exxtacy Bi (9/2001 p. 44) and Star (7/2001 p. 56, 58)). Pulling on flap a rigid wing hang glider can have either a pitch-up or pitch-down effect, depending upon the particular model. Pitch-down (i.e. the bar moves back on its own accord) is noted on the E7 (see test report in "Fly and Glide" 7/1999 p. 32), Atos, Atos S ("Fly and Glide" 11/2000 p.32) and Star ("Fly and Glide" 7/2001 p. 56, 58). On the Exxtacy and Ghostbuster models, pulling on the flaps creates a pitch-up moment (i.e. the bar moves forward). Through flaps which induce a pitch-down moment, because the bar moves back, the pilot has a greater range to push-out forwards from the trim position. This means it is then easier to stall the wing and this in turn increases the danger of unexpectedly entering a spin while in a turn. (see for example the test report on the Atos S for small pilots with short arms in "Fly an Glide" 11/2000 p. 38).
The advantage of flaps which induce pitch-up moments is clear - here the danger of pushing out too far and stalling is reduced, which is also positive should the pilot go into the "alert position" in turbulent air. Moving A-frame As the moving A-frame of a rigid wing hang glider is used to control the spoiler cables and is not tensioned in place by cables as with a flexible hang glider, during a spin the pilot and A-frame will be thrown towards the outer wing by gyro-forces. If the pilot continues to hold the bar then this creates an unwanted and uncontrolled spoiler reaction on the inner wing. This in turn makes it more difficult for the air flow across the inner wing to recover, which is necessary to exit from the spin. Accordingly, pulling in on the bar must be increased to help recover from the spin. Because of the partly chaotic behaviour of a rigid wing hang glider in a spin, large gyro-forces result especially during the recovery phase. These forces, often caused by the unwanted spoiler reactions, can stress the glider over its structural limits and in some cases can lead to its destruction (see for example the report from the experienced US competition pilot Bo Hagewood who invoked a spin on a large Atos and subsequently broke it ("The Oz report", under www.davisstraub.com/OZ/)! Spin susceptibility of rigid wings compared to flexible hang gliders The empirical results of an opinion poll which I have conducted under many experienced rigid wing hang glider pilots and the evaluation of my own year-long experience as a test pilot for different manufacturers lead me to the following conclusions:
This would appear to contradict the current public opinion of the hang gliding community. However, depending on the particular model, even without the VG full on, it is often easier to start a flexible hang glider spinning than a rigid wing hang glider in its certification configuration. This last sentence is important:
Although rigid wing hang gliders are not generally more susceptible to spinning than flexible hang gliders and therefore not generally more dangerous, things are a lot different when are actually in a spin! Due to the problems mentioned above which are caused by the A-frame mounting and often result in chaotic states during uncontrollable spins, the danger associated with spinning rigid wing hang gliders is significant greater than that of a flexible hang glider!
Remedies Being conscious of your own reflex reactions and trying to consciously change them By flying flexible hang gliders certain reflexes are learnt, and with time become instinctive reactions. Such conditioned reflexes must be consciously controlled to prevent them from influencing rigid wing flight negatively. Some of the most commonly observed unconscious reflex reactions which can provoke critical situations if they are applied to rigid wing hang gliders are the following:
Warning signals at the stall-point Before a rigid wing hang glider goes into a stall, the wing sends certain "warning signals", which can be of great help to a receptive pilot. As the bar is pushed forward from the trim position:
It is important to recognise these "warning signals" immediately. In turbulent air this is often difficult especially for beginners.
Outlook The advances made in sail-planes over the past few years reveal a lot of interesting developments which in my opinion are very relevant for rigid wing hang glider designs: instead of merely trying to improve the glide-angle the emphasis is on making handling characteristics more easy while maintaining the same performance. Developing rigid wing hang gliders along these guidelines would lead to changes which include modifications to the profile depth distribution, increased twist at the wingtips and control bar positioned far enough forward. Note: Further information and in-depth aerodynamic details for a better understanding of some of the problems mentioned here can be found on the DHV homepage under "News" in an informative article on spinning. |
The IPPI CardCIVL proficiency badges
And The World Could Fly
|
||||||||||||||||